MAILING ADDRESS: 775 Main Street #221 Westbrook, ME 04098

Phone: (207) 619-5563

Web: Contact Form

with Matthew Scott
Check out our blog--Your home for LIBERTY news, opinion, and SOLUTIONS!

The Dark Agenda Behind Globalism And Open Borders

Home/Political Zeitgeist, Sovereign Solutions Philosophy/The Dark Agenda Behind Globalism And Open Borders

The Dark Agenda Behind Globalism And Open Borders

by Brandon Smith | Activist Post | October 26, 2016

The Dark Agenda Behind Globalism And Open Borders

Sovereign Solutions Editor’s Note:

This post will be the launchpad for future, associated ones regarding highly related, very important topics that require immediate contemplation, discussion, and action by individuals that realize the importance of acting as opposed to being acted upon. 

The focal point will be this and is this here, today:

In order to have more opportunity, security, and freedom in this world human beings individually and more “collectively,” in voluntary fashion, have to demand and act upon in all of their dealings to secure FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION and what that immediately and even eventually entails.

What immediately entails freedom of association are the vital concepts of freedom of separation as well as secession. Without those two things, where is the voluntary nature in the FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION?

So in this vein, do consider the idea of borders and boundaries. You may hear an awful lot about the idea of open borders and supposed free markets. You may assume, too, that desiring a border is deserving of an ad hominem [racist, etc]. 

But have you REALLY thought about what these things mean? And have you thought about what the actual intentions are of those, from upper crust social and power circles, in regards to pushing for abolition of borders? Interestingly enough, the more socialistic circles as well as ostensible free markets and free peoples circles offer up similar verdicts to OPEN BORDERS [as well as inseparable trade agreements such as TPP or NAFTA]

Maybe the first thing to really do is to examine the fallacy that “everyone and everything is potentially compatible.” Are things always so relative, so amorphous, so conducive to conglomeration?

From the featured article:

The point is, some values and social structures are mutually exclusive; no matter how hard you try, certain cultures can never be homogenized with other cultures. You can only eliminate one culture to make room for the other in a border-less world. This is what globalists seek to achieve. It is the greater purpose behind open border policies and globalization – to annihilate ideological competition so that humanity thinks it has no other option but the elitist religion. The ultimate end game of globalists is not to control governments (governments are nothing more than a tool). Rather, their end game is to obtain total psychological influence and eventually consent from the masses.

I cannot overstate the importance of reading the linked featured article. It is especially important. In posts to come I will be covering a good deal of terrain on and around the important issues invoked.

It is time for fundamental re-examination of “society” and “government” and human freedom. In months and years to come the various events, trends, and movements in play will afford great opportunity for people to be sufficiently open and receptive to this. It will be important to have theoretical solutions that CAN and WILL work, as opposed to the same that stuff that has been tried and tested with poor results for most.


While some people see globalism as a “natural offshoot” of free markets or the inevitable outcome of economic progress, the reality is that the simplest explanation (given the evidence at hand) is that globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us.

A significant element of this war concerns the nature of borders. Borders of nations, states and even towns and villages, are not just lines on a map or invisible barriers in the dirt. This is what the elites and the mainstream media would like us to believe. Instead, borders when applied correctly represent principles; or at least, that is supposed to be their function.

Human beings are natural community builders; we are constantly seeking out others of like-mind and like-purpose because we understand subconsciously that groups of individuals working together can (often but not always) accomplish more. That said, human beings also have a natural tendency to value individual freedom and the right to voluntary association. We do not like to be forced to associate with people or groups that do not hold similar values.

Cultures erect borders because, frankly, people have the right to vet those who wish to join and participate in their endeavors. People also have a right to discriminate against anyone who does not share their core values; or, in other words, we have the right to refuse association with other groups and ideologies that are destructive to our own.

Interestingly, globalists and their mouthpieces will argue that by refusing to associate with those who might undermine our values, it is WE who are violating THEIR rights. See how that works?

Read More




Do you have any objections, thoughts, concerns, or contributions? I REALLY WANT TO KNOW. Help me to make this a conversation!

Together we can map out better solutions and truly navigate clearer paths towards quality services, low prices, and better lives.

Oh! And as always, if you find this post useful, do me and so many others a huge favor. When it comes to this kind of information: share and share alike! Information is meant to be disseminated wide and far.

Sovereign Liberty Solutions

Your Home for Liberty Bias in News, Opinion, & Solutions

About the Author:

My name is Matthew. I am founder of and manage Sovereign Liberty Solutions. I am a proponent of free, voluntary association and expression. I understand that there is no single exception or excuse to violate this with the initiation of force, fraud, and coercion. I welcome a genuine dialogue & seek information, news, analysis, and, of course, solutions, whether it be on the individual level or a more voluntary association [group] or even "national" one.

Leave A Comment

CommentLuv badge